<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="RSS_xslt_style.asp" version="1.0" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:WebWizForums="http://syndication.webwizguide.com/rss_namespace/">
 <channel>
  <title>Spam Filter ISP Forums</title>
  <link>http://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/</link>
  <description>This is an XML content feed of; Spam Filter ISP Forums : Last 10 Posts</description>
  <pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 21:13:40 +0000</pubDate>
  <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 04:15:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
  <generator>Web Wiz Forums 9.61</generator>
  <ttl>30</ttl>
  <WebWizForums:feedURL>www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/RSS_topic_feed.asp</WebWizForums:feedURL>
  <item>
   <title>Spam Filter ISP Support : Not a Spam Filter Issue, but MX</title>
   <link>http://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=6872&amp;PID=13791#13791</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/member_profile.asp?PF=104" rel="nofollow">yapadu</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> Not a Spam Filter Issue, but MX<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 04 September 2010 at 4:15am<br /><br />The servers do not need to be listed in your MX records.&nbsp; You can have 1 server listed in the MX records and all your outbound email going through different servers.&nbsp; If you have say 5 servers you use for outbound email you need to specify them in your SPF records (if you publish SPF records).<br><br>The fact that they are not listed in your MX records is fine.&nbsp; MX records tell where to send email, SPF records tell where mail is sent from.<br>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 04:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=6872&amp;PID=13791#13791</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Spam Filter ISP Support : Not a Spam Filter Issue, but MX</title>
   <link>http://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=6872&amp;PID=13790#13790</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/member_profile.asp?PF=902" rel="nofollow">ebtsup</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> Not a Spam Filter Issue, but MX<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 03 September 2010 at 4:17pm<br /><br />Right<DIV>THe outbound server IS included in the SPF framework, but is not in the MX listing, could the be a problem ?&nbsp; As matter-of-fact several outbound servers are listed in the SPF, but they are not listed in the MX records; because we have the MX pointed to SpamFilter server... so I am just concerned about not being listed in the MX.</DIV>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 16:17:57 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=6872&amp;PID=13790#13790</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Spam Filter ISP Support : Not a Spam Filter Issue, but MX</title>
   <link>http://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=6872&amp;PID=13789#13789</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/member_profile.asp?PF=8" rel="nofollow">LogSat</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> Not a Spam Filter Issue, but MX<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 03 September 2010 at 4:04pm<br /><br />I'm afraid so. If you publish an SPF record, you will need to specify which SMTP servers are authorized to send email from your domain (@mydomain.com). If the users will be relaying thru one of your secondary servers listed in the MX records, they too will need to be specified in the SPF record. If not, other antispam filter will see emails from your domain being sent from an IP that is not allowed to do so by your SPF record, and will thus reject those emails.]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 16:04:47 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=6872&amp;PID=13789#13789</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Spam Filter ISP Support : Not a Spam Filter Issue, but MX</title>
   <link>http://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=6872&amp;PID=13788#13788</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/member_profile.asp?PF=902" rel="nofollow">ebtsup</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> Not a Spam Filter Issue, but MX<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 03 September 2010 at 2:37pm<br /><br /><P>We are using spamfilter&nbsp; as our primary MX record.</P><DIV>We have two other MX records as well, only for backup.<BR>SO,<BR>&nbsp; MX&nbsp; spamfilter.mydomain.com&nbsp;&nbsp; pri=10<BR>&nbsp; MX&nbsp; otherfilter.mydomain.com&nbsp;&nbsp; pri=80</DIV><DIV>&nbsp; MX&nbsp; last-resort.mydomain.com&nbsp; pri=90<BR></DIV><DIV>However, when the users send out email, they go through another server that is not in the MX lookup.&nbsp;&nbsp; When we built the SPF, this 'outbound only' email server - is included.<BR><BR>My quetion is: would this create problems for ourselves (or sending email users) - when other spam filters do an MX lookup, and not find the sending server there?<BR></DIV>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 14:37:54 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=6872&amp;PID=13788#13788</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Spam Filter ISP Support : 451 Error resulted in 550 Error back</title>
   <link>http://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=6871&amp;PID=13787#13787</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/member_profile.asp?PF=1056" rel="nofollow">dotme</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 451 Error resulted in 550 Error back<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 02 September 2010 at 5:38pm<br /><br />Hi Roberto - Thanks for the reply, and yes - maybe the new feature needs a little refinement. One other interesting side-effect was&nbsp;in tracing&nbsp;an email released from quarantine 12 hours after it arrived. Again, struck down by the grelylisting, the logfile said it was sending 550 back to the sender SMTP server. But of course that original connection was long gone. <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>Not a big deal, since the sender would have received an NDR when we quarantined anyway, but I thought I'd pass it along.</DIV><DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>As for the greylisting server, we got the client to turn that off. The server was a SmarterMail box, and it seems to greylist based on sender email address, not IP. That's a bizarre way of doing things, but it explains why the 451 came after the Rcpt To.</DIV><span style="font-size:10px"><br /><br />Edited by dotme - 02 September 2010 at 5:39pm</span>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 17:38:24 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=6871&amp;PID=13787#13787</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Spam Filter ISP Support : 451 Error resulted in 550 Error back</title>
   <link>http://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=6871&amp;PID=13786#13786</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/member_profile.asp?PF=8" rel="nofollow">LogSat</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 451 Error resulted in 550 Error back<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 28 August 2010 at 4:29pm<br /><br />dotme,<div><br></div><div>That scenario is indeed a bit unusual. With the new builds, SpamFilter places the sender "on hold" while SpamFilter tries to make sure the destination SMTP server accepts the recipient. SpamFilter actually issues an RCPT TO command to your destination SMTP server, and if the email address specified is accepted, then everything proceeds normally. If your SMTP server rejects the recipient, then SpamFilter issues a 550 SMTP error code back to the sender to notify them of the delivery problem. If your destination SMTP server is offline, SpamFilter won't be able to even connect to the server to send the RCPT TO command to begin with, so in this case the email will be accepted from the sender (assuming it passes all filtering rules), and is placed in a queue for later delivery whenever your SMTP server is back online.</div><div>Back to this specific case now however. Your customer's SMTP server implemented greylisting, but it did not reply with a 451 error right away when SpamFilter connected to it (this would have indeed caused the email to be queued for re-delivery, as SpamFilter would not have been able to connect to your server to begin with). The 451 greylisting error was sent by the SMTP server <i>after</i>&nbsp;SpamFilter connected and sent the HELO command (which indicates a successful connection), specifically the 451 error was sent only after SpamFilter issued the RCPT TO command to verify the existence of the recipient. Since the SMTP server rejected this recipient, this caused the bounce you saw.</div><div><br></div><div>We could in theory have SpamFilter only respond to 5xx errors when it comes to verifying recipients, and ignore any 3xx and 4xx error codes - we'll look into this to see if this could cause any kind of other issues.</div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2010 16:29:41 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=6871&amp;PID=13786#13786</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Spam Filter ISP Support : 451 Error resulted in 550 Error back</title>
   <link>http://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=6871&amp;PID=13784#13784</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/member_profile.asp?PF=1056" rel="nofollow">dotme</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 451 Error resulted in 550 Error back<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 27 August 2010 at 1:37pm<br /><br />We have one of the latest builds with the new backscatter protection,&nbsp;and encountered a strange problem with it. <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>One of the clients we filter for had managed to enable greylisting on their server (We told them to fix that by the way). But in tracing emails, the Logsat behavior was a bit unexpected. When SF tried to deliever an email and was given the 451&nbsp;"try again&nbsp;later"&nbsp;error, it returned a 550 permanent error to the sending server and dropped the email. Here's the logfile line...</DIV><DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>08/25/10 10:26:36:333 -- (620) Some recipients do not exist, <B>sending 550 to sender SMTP server</B>. The destination SMTP server said:sales@redacted.com: 451 Greylisted, please try again in 300 seconds</DIV><DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>So my questions are:</DIV><DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>1) If the receiving server issues a 451 temporary SMTP error, I realize at some point SF needs to give up and return a 550&nbsp;but can I request a feature where you can set the number of retries rather than giving up on the first attempt? That seems a bit harsh.</DIV><DIV>2) What if the receiving server is offline? Does this new routine mean that mail will be dumped if the receiving server happens to be down?</DIV><DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>Thanks in advance!</DIV>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 13:37:15 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=6871&amp;PID=13784#13784</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Spam Filter ISP Support : some whitelisted mails get tagged, others not</title>
   <link>http://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=6870&amp;PID=13783#13783</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/member_profile.asp?PF=1311" rel="nofollow">Pierre</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> some whitelisted mails get tagged, others not<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 27 August 2010 at 5:18am<br /><br />While collecting the needed info, I found the cause. On one (of the 3) relay servers, there was the option "TagSPAMAndQuarantine=1" set in "filters.ini". One the other 2 relays, that settign was set to 0. That was why some of the whitelisted e-mail got tagged and others not.<DIV>Thanks for helping me out. This post can be closed.</DIV>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 05:18:39 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=6870&amp;PID=13783#13783</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Spam Filter ISP Support : some whitelisted mails get tagged, others not</title>
   <link>http://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=6870&amp;PID=13782#13782</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/member_profile.asp?PF=8" rel="nofollow">LogSat</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> some whitelisted mails get tagged, others not<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 26 August 2010 at 9:40pm<br /><br />Pierre,<div><br></div><div>If you can zip and email us SpamFilter's activity logfile for a day this happened, and let us know the to/from email addresses involved, we'll take a look to try to see what is happening. Please also include your SpamFilter.ini file, and the entire \SpamFilter\Domains directory tree. If you are storing any of your blacklist/whitelist files outside that Domains directory, please include those as well.</div><div><br></div><div>If the zip file is over 8MB in size, I'll send you a PM with the info on how to FTP the file to us.</div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 21:40:09 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=6870&amp;PID=13782#13782</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Spam Filter ISP Support : some whitelisted mails get tagged, others not</title>
   <link>http://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=6870&amp;PID=13781#13781</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/member_profile.asp?PF=1311" rel="nofollow">Pierre</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> some whitelisted mails get tagged, others not<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 26 August 2010 at 5:19am<br /><br /><P>Hi, Thanks for the reply.</P><P>The "unfiltered emails" list is empty. So I don't think that is the reason. When I looked at some of the emails that get tagged, I first thouht it was a combination of filter type and whitelist that triggered it, but I now rather think it is the combination of receiving address and whitelist. Not sure if it is. Also, the log file does not mention anything regarding the tagging of e-mails.</P>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 05:19:39 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=6870&amp;PID=13781#13781</guid>
  </item> 
 </channel>
</rss>